Hello 

After watching both videos, I have to say I am surprised by the lack of journalistic integrity that has been displayed by the interviewer.  As a journalist you should have a un biased outlook on the situation and also do some background research on the person you are interviewing before you go in and hit him with softball questions and shake your head when he describes Amber only giving him 200$ isnt it your job to stay neutral? So that the audience can have a fair chance in choosing a side. If the interviewer seems disgusted by what she is hearing may sway the publics opinion from jump.

Now simply googling Janero, You find stories that have been written about him in the past.
I am not saying that all what you find in google to be true but it does help put things into perspective when interviewing someone.

1- Janero claims that he had ” a verbal agreement” with Amber for 20 % and that he has other clients in the biz, so one would assume that he’s done this before and he should know to have paper work drawn up because he is running a business. He decided to handle this particular deal verbally? 

2- You asked him why didn’t he sue Amber for his 20% and he claimed that lawyers are expensive etc… I found an article from Bossip (not necessarily facts)  that Janero was a Law student at NYC http://bossip.com/155343/we-are-hearing-rihanna-has-a-new-anonymous-piece-of/ Now wouldnt a law student know the importance of a written contract and or know friends and or  classmates who can give him free counselling on how to reclaim funds he believed to be owed from a client. 

3- He  claims to have  ”introduced” Kanye to Amber. But yet you never inquired about his relationship with Kanye prior to Amber, Did he only send an email to a general casting call set up on-line by Kanye? or Had he introduced them face to face and give Amber a definite cosign. These types of questions would have made the interview more compelling and also garner a reputation for yourself has a hard hitting interviewer that wants the facts. From the looks of it all he did was send out an email, but you didnt think to ask him about that. 

4- He claims that he made Amber famous over the robocop video in 1 month and half but how can that be if the video never came out? 

5- In your second interview he claims that the video director left a voice mail stating that Amber was paid 100k for the video. But in another interview with Theybf.com http://theybf.com/2012/01/23/exclusive-details-amber-roses-former-publicist-blasts-her-says-shes-a-thief-calls-her-lie?page=1 He says that he actually Saw the payment receipt to Amber. Now why would Hype williams or whoever is in charge of casting show Janero a payment receipt of dealing with a model?

6- If he is trying to EXPOSE Amber why are dates and full emails blacked out on the screen grabs, or partially shown? I understand blocking out “personal email addresses” but why everything else?  In the email where amber talks about what he did by telling Kanye everything why is there only 1 line? where is the context of that email?

there are alot of holes in this story and I don’t like the way the interview was conducted and it was very amateur..especially if your are going to retweet “young Oprah or black Connie chung” You should have higher standards, better location and a better cameraman with better questions to simply give both sides of the story. 

He also admits himself, that he is a LAW student numerous times. So there you have it! A law student who speaks like an idiot using the wrong tense (in your interview) and who doesn’t believe in written contracts, Who doesn’t have the networking power as a law student to get free counsil to represent him for a 20 k claim?

Also since you were so excited to post this story as an exclusive without vetting it… the least you can do is use the word “allegedly” as to not state anything as fact. imo